Personal Injury Law Practicing Free Essay Example, 1250 words

Negligent infliction of emotional distress is a tort and by legal definition is known as the controversial cause of action. It goes ahead to affirm that one has a duty to use reasonable care to avoid causing emotional distress to another individual. The negation of this call of duty constitutes a tort that is termed as intentional infliction of emotional distress that there is no need to prove the intent. In this case, going by definition reasonable care was provided by the Kings Burger to the extent that this tort is not applicable in any form or shape. The court approved strict liability tort where the manufactures, sellers and the supplier are held accountable for the injuries made by the product formed. For a case to full fill the criteria of summary judgment where there is no unnecessary trial, two legal aspects must be critically put into consideration. One of the parties involved in the case is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Here evidence has to be provided and the procedure of the litigation is upheld and done expeditiously to the later without reprove. We will write a custom essay sample on Personal Injury Law Practicing or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/page In addition, the case being dropped based on the assertion of King Burgher was the wisest ruling the court did because in real sense King Burgher are not the manufacturers or the supplier or the seller of the coffee to give out the warning that the afflicted family demanded thus in true wisdom they are not accountable. I disagree that the fact that Christopher suffered second-degree burns is sufficient to establish a reasonable existence of an issue of material facts mention earlier.